On 08/16/2017 05:41 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/16/2017 04:34 PM, John Snow wrote: >> Looks like this series got no replies (maybe a failure of my mail >> filtering?) but it has since been merged, so purely for my own selfish >> purposes; > > No replies to v2 due to the fact that the differences from v1 were > trivial enough to keep R-b from that spin (it was mostly conflict > resolution that required the respin). >
That's fine; just very visibly marking it as "done" for the purposes of the list, archives, tooling, etc. --js
