On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Arun R Bharadwaj <a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Gautham R Shenoy <e...@in.ibm.com> > > infrastructure for offloading blocking tasks such as making posix calls on > to the helper threads and handle the post_posix_operations() from the > context of the iothread. This frees the vcpu thread to process any other guest > operations while the processing of v9fs_io is in progress. > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <e...@in.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi <sripat...@in.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > hw/virtio-9p.c | 164 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > posix-aio-compat.c | 30 +++------- > qemu-threadlets.c | 21 +++++++ > qemu-threadlets.h | 1 > vl.c | 3 + > 5 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Is there code queued up which makes use of this in virtfs? I ask because at the moment this is deadcode. If you are restructuring this patch series, perhaps move the signal related changes into a commit - they are independent of virtfs. Stefan
