CC. Fam and David.
Any idea about it?
Thanks
Zhang Chen
On 07/25/2017 09:02 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>On 24/07/2017 12:38, [email protected] wrote:
>> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll in the
>> iothread_run function.
>
>That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
>unfortunately. aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.
Hi Paolo,
Any other good idea to achieve this?
Thanks
>
>Paolo
>
>> After that IOThread
>> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work
together.
>>
>> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit
原始邮件
*发件人：*<[email protected]>;
*收件人：*王勇10170530;<[email protected]>;<[email protected]>;<[email protected]>;
*抄送人：*<[email protected]>;<[email protected]>;<[email protected]>;<[email protected]>;王广10165992;
*日 期 ：*2017年07月24日 19:59
*主 题 ：**Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the
IOThreadofthe primary*
On 24/07/2017 12:38, [email protected] wrote:
> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll in the
> iothread_run function.
That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
unfortunately. aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.
Paolo
> After that IOThread
> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work together.
>
> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit a patch.
--
Thanks
Zhang Chen
