I noticed you were wondering what happend to this message in the patchew thread:
http://patchew.org/QEMU/[email protected]/ Markus, apparently this is because of the unusual "In-Reply-To" header of your message, which confuses patchew: In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau"'s message of "Tue, 9 May 2017 20:35:45 +0300") Is this an extension of your email client, or a standard? In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.4: > The "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" field each contain one or more > unique message identifiers, optionally separated by CFWS. > > The message identifier (msg-id) is similar in syntax to an angle-addr > construct without the internal CFWS. > > message-id = "Message-ID:" msg-id CRLF > > in-reply-to = "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF > > references = "References:" 1*msg-id CRLF I can imagine if consider CFWS, patchew should probably just work (I can fix that), but it's still good to understand this. Fam
