On 03/05/2017 13:38, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Detected by GCC 7's -Wformat-truncation. snprintf writes at most >> 2 bytes here including the terminating NUL, so the result is >> truncated. In addition, the newline at the end is pointless. >> Fix the buffer size and the format string. >> --- >> hw/display/jazz_led.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/display/jazz_led.c b/hw/display/jazz_led.c >> index b72fdb1717..3c97d56434 100644 >> --- a/hw/display/jazz_led.c >> +++ b/hw/display/jazz_led.c >> @@ -227,13 +227,13 @@ static void jazz_led_invalidate_display(void *opaque) >> static void jazz_led_text_update(void *opaque, console_ch_t *chardata) >> { >> LedState *s = opaque; >> - char buf[2]; >> + char buf[3]; >> >> dpy_text_cursor(s->con, -1, -1); >> qemu_console_resize(s->con, 2, 1); >> >> /* TODO: draw the segments */ >> - snprintf(buf, 2, "%02hhx\n", s->segments); >> + snprintf(buf, 3, "%02hhx", s->segments); >> console_write_ch(chardata++, ATTR2CHTYPE(buf[0], QEMU_COLOR_BLUE, >> QEMU_COLOR_BLACK, 1)); >> console_write_ch(chardata++, ATTR2CHTYPE(buf[1], QEMU_COLOR_BLUE, > > Since we're only every interested in the first two characters, the > truncation is totally harmless. Thus, your patch cleans doesn't really > "fix bad snprintf", it cleans up an unclean one. Consider rewording the > commit message accordingly.
My reading is that buf[1] is always '\0' in the current code: "snprintf writes at most 2 bytes here including the terminating NUL, so the result is truncated". Paolo > Regardless, > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >