On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 12:06:40PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > The '-enable-...' option do not make too much sense: They do not > allow additional parameters, using '-accel xxx' is shorter than > '-enable-xxx' and we're also inconsistent here, since there is > no '-enable-xen' option available. So let's try to convince the > users to use '-accel xxx' instead.
What is our general approach to deciding which of our "legacy" parameters are merely syntactic sugar for other parameters, vs stuff we want to deprecate & eventually remove ? Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
