* Eric Blake ([email protected]) wrote:
> On 04/06/2017 10:41 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]>
> >
> > Gcc 7 (on Fedora 26) spotted odd use of integers instead of a
> > boolean; it's got a point.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > tests/check-qdict.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/check-qdict.c b/tests/check-qdict.c
> > index 81162ee572..6f3fbcf9c1 100644
> > --- a/tests/check-qdict.c
> > +++ b/tests/check-qdict.c
> > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void qdict_join_test(void)
> > g_assert(qdict_size(dict1) == 2);
> > g_assert(qdict_size(dict2) == !overwrite);
> >
> > - g_assert(qdict_get_int(dict1, "foo") == overwrite ? 84 : 42);
> > + g_assert(qdict_get_int(dict1, "foo") == (overwrite ? 84 : 42));
>
> How is the test passing pre-patch, and why does it not change the test
> post-patch? Does that mean that overwrite is not doing what we expected?
Pre-patch it passes because either 84 or 42 are valid 'true' values into
g_assert.
Post patch it ends up as either:
qdict_get_int(dict1, "foo") == 42
or
qdict_get_int(dict1, "foo") == 84
which is what's intended.
Dave
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
