On 3 March 2017 at 18:37, Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes: >> Did you find these by looking at our Coverity results, or >> cross-reference them against Coverity? (Coverity definitely >> found the gluster leaks, for instance.) > > Neither. I merely hacked myself a path through an unfamliar jungle :)
OK; I guess we'll see how many of the coverity nits get fixed :-) thanks -- PMM
