Hi, FWTS supports multiple architectures:
- amd64 - arm64 - armhf - i386 - ppc64el - s390x Package details are available @ https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-fwts-stable/+packages FWTS also supports device tree to some extent, thanks to contributions from Jeremy Kerr & Deb McLemore. Cheers, Alex Hung On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Heyi Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just to confirm that FWTS is supporting aarch64. > > Alex is the maintainer of FWTS and may provide more information. > > Regards, > > Gary (Heyi Guo) > > > 在 2/9/2017 2:47 AM, Laszlo Ersek 写道: >> >> On 02/08/17 19:23, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> >>> On 8 February 2017 at 16:27, Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The _CCA property is mandatory on arm64, and there is no default. >>> >>> Is there a tool that can check this kind of requirement >>> and complain about issues in the ACPI tables (and >>> ditto, device tree)? It's really easy to produce a >>> dt or ACPI table that works with current kernels and >>> then turns out to have a problem six or twelve >>> months down the line :-( >> >> I think the "bios bits" project or the FWTS (firmware test suite) >> project might do some ACPI sanity checks. They could be run in guests. >> >> https://biosbits.org/ >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirmwareTestSuite >> >> However, I'm unsure if they support aarch64. Also... it's not like those >> projects are stationary. Even the ACPI spec is a moving target (and >> spec-level regressions exist). >> >> I believe Heyi Guo @ Linaro used to work with FWTS on aarch64. CC'd. >> >> No clue about DT conformance testing. Is there an industry standard or a >> working group behind DT? >> >> Thanks >> Laszlo >> > -- Cheers, Alex Hung
