On 11/06/2016 08:52 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Richard Henderson (4):
target-m68k: Do not cpu_abort on undefined insns
target-m68k: Inline shifts
target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for registers
target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for memory
There is something wrong with the bitfield patches, because when I use
them instead of the version I use usually I'm not able to boot a
container with qemu-m68k (SEGFAULT).
Ah, too bad. I was testing with the linux-user-0.3 busybox, but we don't yet
implement enough to actually execute it. So the testing consisted of maybe 3
or 4 such insns until I reach the fmovemx. ;-)
Can you tell if the breakage is limited to the memory patch, or if the register
patch is also broken?
r~
