On 31 October 2016 at 11:56, Krzeminski, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <[email protected]> wrote: >> "after exiting interrupt handler" is the wrong condition to check. >> You need to: >> * cause the interrupt line to be set >> * enter the interrupt handler as a result (int becomes active) >> * cause the interrupt line to be lowered (while in the handler) >> * cause the interrupt line to be set again (still in the handler) >> * check the interrupt pending state (still in the handler) >> > I performed this test, and when we are in interrupt handler (constantly > pooling pending bit) interrupt is re-pend just after line is set again. > V3 behaves in the same way.
Great -- thanks for checking. -- PMM
