On 22/09/2016 17:38, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/qemu/seqlock.h b/include/qemu/seqlock.h
>> index 2e2be4c..8dee11d 100644
>> --- a/include/qemu/seqlock.h
>> +++ b/include/qemu/seqlock.h
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline void seqlock_init(QemuSeqLock *sl)
>> /* Lock out other writers and update the count. */
>> static inline void seqlock_write_begin(QemuSeqLock *sl)
>> {
>> - ++sl->sequence;
>> + atomic_set(&sl->sequence, sl->sequence + 1);
>
> The read side isn't using a atomic_read right here.
There cannot be concurrent writes, so this is okay (and actually helps
catching seqlock write-side critical sections not protected by a mutex
or something else).
The rule is that there is a race if two accesses, one of them a write
_and_ one of them not atomic, are concurrent.
So reads not concurrent with any writes are fine (e.g. if all writes are
under a mutex, reads under the mutex are fine too).
Paolo
