On 14/07/2016 13:10, Sergey Fedorov wrote: > > This has merge conflicts with the current state of master. Is there > > anyway to have a common implementation that is specialised only when > > needed? > > The point was to put the assumptions on invalid CPU TB state as close to > cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definitions as possible. So that if anyone make > changes they can notice those assumptions and correct them if necessary.
It causes some repetition indeed, but I think it's a good idea. restore_state_to_opc is another case where most implementations have the same simple "env->pc = data[0]" implementation. Paolo
