On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:20:54AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> first remove VCPU from exec loop and only then remove lapic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
> ---
> target-i386/cpu.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 2fa445d..f86dae0 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> @@ -2963,6 +2963,20 @@ out:
> }
> }
>
> +static void x86_cpu_unrealizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(dev);
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> + cpu_remove_sync(CPU(dev));
> + qemu_unregister_reset(x86_cpu_machine_reset_cb, dev);
> +#endif
> +
> + if (cpu->apic_state) {
> + object_unparent(OBJECT(cpu->apic_state));
As patch 17/19 drops the reference corresponding to
cpu->apic_state (leaving only the child property reference), this
will leave cpu->apic_state pointing to a dead object. Please set
it to NULL.
> + }
> +}
> +
> typedef struct BitProperty {
> uint32_t *ptr;
> uint32_t mask;
> @@ -3205,6 +3219,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
> void *data)
>
> xcc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
> dc->realize = x86_cpu_realizefn;
> + dc->unrealize = x86_cpu_unrealizefn;
> dc->props = x86_cpu_properties;
>
> xcc->parent_reset = cc->reset;
> --
> 2.7.0
>
--
Eduardo
