On 21 June 2016 at 18:09, Peter Maydell <[email protected]> wrote: > This set of patches is a development based on the ones from Vijaya: > the general idea is similar but I have tried to improve the interface > for defining the page size a bit. I've also tweaked patches 2 and 3 > to address code review comments.
> NB: I have only very lightly tested these and haven't attempted > to measure performance at all. There is an assert() in the > definition of TARGET_PAGE_BITS which is good for making sure > it isn't used before it's valid but not so good for speed. Vijaya, are you in a position to test this patchset for performance? Presumably you have a test case benchmark you're looking to improve here? thanks -- PMM
