On 22 June 2016 at 12:54, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > * Peter Maydell ([email protected]) wrote: >> On 22 June 2016 at 12:35, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Yes, my hope is that any versioned machine type should migrate to >> > a newer qemu with the same machine type set. >> > >> > There are really two separate things that we state with the machine >> > versioning: >> > a) that the guest view is the same >> > b) that the migration format is the same >> >> Well, this is true for PC. > > PC, ppc/spapr, and I think s390. > >> But my impression when we started >> applying versioned machine types to ARM virt was that it was >> signing up to (a) but not (yet) (b)... > > So that would make ARM special; the problem is we have no way > to communicate to the user that it's special.
Is anybody testing that migration between versions for virt works? thanks -- PMM
