On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:47:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > ERMS just says "rep movsb" and "rep stosb" are fast. It does not > imply any new instruction, so we can support it easily. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <[email protected]> Applied to x86-next. Thanks. > --- > target-i386/cpu.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c > index 3665fec..3871eb8 100644 > --- a/target-i386/cpu.c > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c > @@ -358,10 +358,11 @@ static const char *cpuid_6_feature_name[] = { > #define TCG_7_0_EBX_FEATURES (CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMEP | CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMAP | \ > CPUID_7_0_EBX_BMI1 | CPUID_7_0_EBX_BMI2 | CPUID_7_0_EBX_ADX | \ > CPUID_7_0_EBX_PCOMMIT | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLFLUSHOPT | \ > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLWB | CPUID_7_0_EBX_MPX | CPUID_7_0_EBX_FSGSBASE) > + CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLWB | CPUID_7_0_EBX_MPX | CPUID_7_0_EBX_FSGSBASE | \ > + CPUID_7_0_EBX_ERMS) > /* missing: > CPUID_7_0_EBX_HLE, CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX2, > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_ERMS, CPUID_7_0_EBX_INVPCID, CPUID_7_0_EBX_RTM, > + CPUID_7_0_EBX_INVPCID, CPUID_7_0_EBX_RTM, > CPUID_7_0_EBX_RDSEED */ > #define TCG_7_0_ECX_FEATURES (CPUID_7_0_ECX_PKU | CPUID_7_0_ECX_OSPKE) > #define TCG_APM_FEATURES 0 > -- > 2.5.5 > -- Eduardo
