On 06/19/2016 01:35 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:32 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> The instruction set PPC_POWER_BR contains nearly all the deleted
>> instructions from isa2. rfi is not part of it and should. Also, only
>> the cpus "PowerPC 601*" make a use of it in their insns_flags.
>
> Are you sure those arent the old POWER instructions as in pre-powerPC
> architecture that 601 (and only 601) supports ?
OK. I get it now.
All the deleted instructions from POWER are/should be under the set
PPC_POWER.
All the deleted instructions from POWER2 are under the set PPC_POWER2.
None of these sets are in use.
For the "PowerPC 601*" cpus, we moved a couple from set PPC_POWER to
subset PPC_POWER_BR.
rfi is special. it is under PPC_FLOW and all CPUs can use it
>> So, we would want this set to be in all the "PowerPC {6,7}*" cpus.
>> Are there more ?
>
> All 32-bit hash based CPUs are arch 1.x and support rfi
>
> All 64-bit hash based CPUs we support (ie, POWER4 and later) are
> architecture 2.x and later.
>
> So my test is correct in the context of what we emulate today.
OK. so this is an openbios issue when run under a ppc64. shouldn't we
be using an openbios-ppc64 in that case ?
We could be more strict with the rfi instruction.
C.
