On Thu, 06/02 20:42, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/02/2016 08:07 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > > This is sometimes a useful value we should count in. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <[email protected]> > > --- > > block/raw-posix.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > > > Will conflict with patches I'm about to post to rework BlockLimits to be > byte-based, rather than a mix of byte- and sector values. First one in > gets to watch the other rebase :)
Thanks! I'm looking forward to a byte based BlockLimits! Fam
