On 05/06/2016 03:48 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > It doesn't matter what you changed, fact is that you are not building an > unoptimized stage1 compiler, so you are comparing apples with oranges.
Well, I know Matthias Klose well enough in that regard that I think I can trust him to produce a usable gcc package. I'm aware that this isn't the vanilla upstream gcc, but at least it gives me something that I can use and that builds all three stages on qemu-m68k without any issues. I'm not claiming that the emulation is on par with Aranym yet, it isn't. But at least we are able to set up m68k buildds that can keep up with the rest of the crowd speedwise. As good as Aranym is, it's just too slow for the purpose of setting up a buildd and I'm very glad that qemu-m68k exists in that regard. My only goal is to make qemu-m68k better and it's getting there, we even had ghc developers fix issues in the code, so we are making some actual progress. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913