On 03/16/2016 06:46 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > That should be now a "if (has_iamr)" instead of "if (!has_iamr)", > shouldn't it?
yes .... I will send an update for this patch only. Sorry for the noise. C.
On 03/16/2016 06:46 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > That should be now a "if (has_iamr)" instead of "if (!has_iamr)", > shouldn't it?
yes .... I will send an update for this patch only. Sorry for the noise. C.