On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 06:49:43PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 09/03/2016 18:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > @@ -3131,7 +3118,9 @@ static bool qemu_chr_open_socket_fd(CharDriverState
> > *chr, Error **errp)
> > if (qio_channel_socket_listen_sync(sioc, s->addr, errp) < 0) {
> > goto fail;
> > }
> > - qemu_chr_finish_socket_connection(chr, sioc);
> > + s->listen_ioc = sioc;
> > + s->listen_tag = qio_channel_add_watch(
> > + QIO_CHANNEL(s->listen_ioc), G_IO_IN, tcp_chr_accept, chr,
> > NULL);
> > } else if (s->reconnect_time) {
> > qio_channel_socket_connect_async(sioc, s->addr,
> > qemu_chr_socket_connected,
>
> Aha, yes, this could be it. If you move WSAEventSelect to
> qio_channel_set_blocking, the previous patch will probably become
> unnecessary.
Yes, I've tested that and you're correct, so I've dropped the previous
patch.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
