On 03/08/2016 04:37 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 10:11 AM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 03:42 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2016 05:20 AM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
>>>> On 03/01/2016 07:21 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On 03/01/2016 08:24 AM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    lt = float32_lt_quiet(arg1, arg2, &env->fp_status);
>>>>>> +    eq = float32_eq_quiet(arg1, arg2, &env->fp_status);
>>>>>> +    uo = float32_unordered(arg1, arg2, &env->fp_status);
>>>>>
>>>>> Do it in one step with float32_compare.
>>>>> You don't want _quiet; see below re psw_flags.
>>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, if I don't use _quiet my tests fail against real
>>>> hardware...
>>>
>>> Fail in what way?  I don't think _quiet computes all of the bits you
>>> need.
>>
>> Also as far as I see the softfloat implementation, _quiet only
>> determines whether an invalid exception is raised if the inputs are any
>> nans or just signaling nans.
>>
> 
> You're right -- I mis-read the set_FI status at the bottom of the page.
> 
> 
> r~

No problem ;). I think I have a v2 ready today. Thanks again for the
great review.

Cheers,
Bastian

Reply via email to