Hi Denis,
On (Tue) 23 Feb 2016 [13:09:26], Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Fri) 12 Feb 2016 [09:39:32], Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > There is a possibility to hit an assert in qcow2_get_specific_info that
> > s->qcow_version is undefined. This happens when VM in starting from
> > suspended state, i.e. it processes incoming migration, and in the same
> > time 'info block' is called.
> >
> > The problem is that qcow2_invalidate_cache() closes the image and
> > memset()s BDRVQcowState in the middle.
> >
> > This operation should not be performed in coroutine context.
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > - fixed spelling. Eric, thank you for spell checking
>
> BTW I noticed this just now: the commit subject line for both the
> patches is the same. Please avoid that in the future.
The pull req failed to apply due to another patchset - could you
please do a v3 with better subject lines for the patches?
Thanks,
Amit
