On 10/02/16 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to > check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first > bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty > and cpu_physical_memory_all_dirty. This requires a few changes in the > iteration; change the code in cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range to > match. > > Fixes: 5b82b70 > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> > --- > include/exec/ram_addr.h | 55 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
It fixes the performance problem I was seeing: Tested-by: Leon Alrae <[email protected]> Thanks, Leon
