On 02/04/2016 04:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
>> index 595af1a..f712db5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
>> @@ -543,6 +543,33 @@ static int virtscsi_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
>> return virtscsi_tmf(vscsi, cmd);
>> }
>>
>> +static enum blk_eh_timer_return virtscsi_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = shost_priv(sc->device->host);
>> + struct virtio_scsi_cmd *cmd;
>> +
>> + scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, sc, "timeout\n");
>> + cmd = mempool_alloc(virtscsi_cmd_pool, GFP_NOIO);
>> + if (!cmd)
>> + return FAILED;
>
> Should this be BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED? Apart from this, the patch looks
> good. And of course this doesn't affect Jim, who can test this patch
> anyway.
>
Why, but of course.
I'll be sending the official patch to linux-scsi.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
[email protected] +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
