On Tue 10 Nov 2015 04:44:19 AM CET, Max Reitz wrote: > The information which BB is concerned does not seem useful enough to > justify its existence in most other place (which may be related to qemu > printing the -drive parameter in question anyway, and for blockdev-add > the attribution is naturally unambiguous). Furthermore, as of a future > patch, bdrv_get_device_name(bs) will always return the empty string > before bdrv_open_inherit() returns. > > Therefore, just dropping that information seems to be the best course of > action. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <[email protected]> Berto
