On 23 October 2015 at 23:00, Richard Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Some targets already had this within their logic, but make sure > it's present for all targets. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> > --- > Version 2 updates the language as discussed in the followup in v1. > > Peter, in that followup you mentioned that we ought to just use +1 > for all targets. I was about to do that when I noticed the comment > in the arm32 port about it being better to use the correct insn size > in order to avoid warnings from the disassembler. So I left my good > estimates as-is from v1.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> though really we should shut up the disassembler some other way somehow..."pick the insn length" doesn't work for variable-insn-length CPUs. thanks -- PMM
