Eduardo, On 10/13/15 21:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are >>> just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different >>> (and less surprising?) way. >>> >>>>> >>>>> With the typo fix in the Cc tag: >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> >> >> Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not >> super urgent. > > Applied. Thanks! >
can you please send a PULL with this? We're in soft freeze for 2.5, according to <http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.5>, but this qualifies I think. Thanks! Laszlo
