On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:34:46AM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Alistair Francis > <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> wrote: > > It is possible for the guest to set an invalid block > > size which is larger then the fifo_buffer[] array. This > > could cause a buffer overflow. > > > > To avoid this limit the maximum size of the blksize variable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> > > Suggested-by: Igor Mitsyanko <i.mitsya...@gmail.com> > > Reported-by: Intel Security ATR <sec...@intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.pe...@gmail.com> > > With Pavan's patches and now this, the SD patches are starting to pile > up on list. What queue do they target? target-arm (as lead/major user) > or something block-related?
I can pick them up for now in my block pull requests. Note that I'm not an SD expert so I can't review/maintain the code. Stefan
