On 09/28/2015 04:57 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jason Wang <[email protected]> writes: > >> Instead of using a new type for default model (82540em), using an >> alias for this to avoid bit duplication. > Suggest to rephrase as > > Instead of duplicating the "e1000-82540em" device model as "e1000", > make the latter an alias for the former.
Fix like this and apply the patch in my tree. > >> Cc: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> Thanks.
