On 28/09/2015 12:15, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:36:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > +int qemu_lockcnt_count(QemuLockCnt *lockcnt); > Why use int here when the counter field is unsigned?
Nice catch, will fix. Paolo
On 28/09/2015 12:15, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:36:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > +int qemu_lockcnt_count(QemuLockCnt *lockcnt); > Why use int here when the counter field is unsigned?
Nice catch, will fix. Paolo