On 4 August 2015 at 22:36, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This makes sense, but the description says master will > close the socket. This makes no sense to me. > Maybe we should leave the code as is, but rename the message > to RESET_DEVICE then? > That sounds reasonable to me. In my patch I adopted the existing (unused) protocol message because it seemed like a good fit but perhaps it was not the perfect one. (More from me when we have added a driver reload test in our CI.) Cheers, -Luke
