On 06/04/2015 02:44 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-06-04 14:07, Richard Henderson wrote:I think you should check for copies first, and only then do the TEMP_CONST check. That way we get to remove an op.If the state of a temp is TCG_TEMP_CONST, it can't be a copy as its state should be TCG_TEMP_COPY for that.
Ah, true. I'd forgotten how that copy ring was represented. The existing patch is fine, if you prefer. r~
