On 03/06/2015 17:27, Markus Armbruster wrote: > I agree that "watchdog-action" is an ugly name for backend > configuration. "watchdog" would be fine, but we foolishly burned that > on silly command line sugar for the frontend. > > "watchdog-config"? Precedent: "semihosting-config".
Sucks, but at least is consistent. It was hard to convince me on this as I was just typing "git send-pull" when I got your review, but you did it. :) Paolo > Then make -watchdog T pure sugar for -device T, and -watchdog-action A > pure sugar for -watchdog-config action=A. > > Not demands, just ideas.
