On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 05:16:35AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 10.04.2015 um 00:48 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> > Am 09.04.2015 um 22:22 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> >> On 09/04/2015 21:57, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> This helps us avoid memory leaks when using object_property_add_alias(), 
> >>> as it
> >>> is not practical for callers to save target_name to free it later.
> >>>
> >>> Eduardo Habkost (2):
> >>>   qom: strdup() target property name on object_property_add_alias()
> >>>   qdev: Free property names after registering gpio aliases
> >>>
> >>>  hw/core/qdev.c | 2 ++
> >>>  qom/object.c   | 5 +++--
> >>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Good idea!
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Looks good to me in general, I'm just surprised that there are not more
> > cleanups resulting out of this? At least my pc87312 series will need
> > changes then. Will take a deeper look another day.
> 
> Thanks, applied to qom-next:
> https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-next

Thanks. Is it expected to appear in a pull request soon? This is needed
for the X86CPU properties patch that's on the x86 queue.

-- 
Eduardo

Reply via email to