Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > c_type() is designed to be called on both string names and on > array designations, so 'name' is a bit misleading because it > operates on more than strings. Also, no caller ever passes > an empty string. Finally, + notation is a bit nicer to read > than '%s' % value for string concatenation. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
