Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with > expressions that aren't up to par. Later patches will improve > the expected results as the generator is made stricter. Only > a few of the the added tests actually behaves sanely at
behave > rejecting obvious problems or demonstrating success. > > Note that in some cases, we reject bad QAPI merely because our > pseudo-JSON parser does not yet know how to parse numbers. This > series does not address that, but when a later series adds support > for numeric defaults of integer fields, the testsuite will ensure > that we don't lose the error (and hopefully that the error > message quality is improved). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
