On Wed, 03/25 08:16, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:42:32AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > > > Block jobs are confusingly inconsistent between with and without > > throttling: if user sets a bps limit, starts a block job, then stops > > vm, the block job will not make any progress; in contrary, if user > > unsets the bps limit, the block job will run normally. > > Wait, that's not what happens: > > a) If you start a job then stop the vm then the job will be > completed immediately. > b) If you stop the vm then start the job then it won't make any > progress. > > This patch fixes b), but a) still happens. >
Ah you're right, I put the order wrong. I'v just started looking at issue a). I'll fix the text. Fam
