Alberto Garcia <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:20:31AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: [...] >> Ignorant question: can "device" be ""? If yes, we should document >> what that means, possibly in a separate patch. > > Yes it can be "", the purpose of the patch is precisely to expand the > event with a new field that can identify the node in such cases. > > The only reason why it is not optional is to keep backward > compatibility. > > But it's true that it can be clarified in the documentation, I can > send a follow-up patch as soon as this one is merged.
Follow-up patch works for me.
