On 2015-03-18 14:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> @@ -2591,9 +2596,12 @@ void *address_space_map(AddressSpace *as,
> }
>
> l = len;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> mr = address_space_translate(as, addr, &xlat, &l, is_write);
> +
> if (!memory_access_is_direct(mr, is_write)) {
> if (atomic_xchg(&bounce.in_use, true)) {
Doesn't apply due to differences in the line above.
What is this patch based on? Do you have a public branch where I can
find the series and its dependencies?
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return NULL;
> }
> /* Avoid unbounded allocations */
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
