On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 09:26:17PM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 March 2015 at 19:45, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 09:15:41AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > > I can drop this one as a work around but I wonder why is clang warning > > about unused static inlines. > > > > We have a ton of these in each header and it doesn't warn, > > in theory static inline should be same as macro: harmless > > unless used. > > It warns about them in .c files but not .h files. > > -- PMM
What a strange thing to do, seems to mix up concepts from preprocessor and compiler stages. Anyway, I sent pull v6 adding a patch to drop this. It's just a warning, and I'm guessing full bisectability with clang isn't that important, so not rebasing because of this. -- MST
