20.02.2015 19:06, Radim Krčmář wrote:
[]
> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> index 45da34ad6129..93818675588e 100644
> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ static void virtio_net_vhost_status(VirtIONet *n, uint8_t
> status)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!!n->vhost_started ==
> - (virtio_net_started(n, status) && !nc->peer->link_down)) {
> + if ((virtio_net_started(n, status) && !nc->peer->link_down) ==
> + !!n->vhost_started) {
btw, can this be rewritten as
(bool)n->vhost_started
instead of
!!n->vhos_started
?
Not questioning the patch itself, just wondering, as these
double-negatives look ugly...
Thanks,
/mjt
