On 20.08.14 14:11, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 08/20/2014 10:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 20.08.14 13:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 08/20/2014 09:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 20.08.14 12:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>>> On 07/17/2014 04:30 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>>>> On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>>>> Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>>>>>>> No, you should politely bother them again. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That does not seem helping though :-/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can >>>>>>> ack it. It looks good to me though. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me clarify things here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to >>>>>> 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current >>>>>> upstream, >>>>>> repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that >>>>>> correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> This is my current set: >>>>>> 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface >>>>>> 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface >>>>>> 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface >>>>>> 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass >>>>>> 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alex, ping. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Uh, what exactly do you expect from me? :) >>> >>> No idea :) You could take patches to your tree. I do not understand what to >>> do with this set now. Please help. Thanks. >> >> The way I understood your last email you wanted to rebase and repost >> them at which point someone could pick them up :) > > I wanted answer to "is that correct?" :) > And I tried replaying the patchset on top of your ppc-next, it applied. But > I'll repost to make sure that we have the same thing.
Oh, cool. I'll apply them as soon as I finished to recover my HD then :) Alex
