On 06/25/14 15:16, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:14:08 -0600 > Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 06/25/2014 07:02 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:36:36 -0600 >>> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> [cc'ing Luiz] >>>> >>>> On 06/24/2014 08:21 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>>>> On 05/29/14 23:05, Eric Blake wrote: >>>>>> On 05/29/2014 02:43 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> In this series I try to implement the ideas that (I believe) were >>>>>>> suggested by Gerd and Amit in >>>>>>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080376>. >>>>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> I'm thinking about resuming work on this. Wenchao's series has been >>>>> applied (ends at commit 75175173). We're between soft and hard freeze >>>>> now. Should I aim at 2.1 or 2.2? >>>> >>>> This series was posted before soft freeze, but adds a new feature. If >>>> we're going to get it in the 2.1 release, it must be before hard freeze. >>>> I'll leave it up to Luiz whether a QMP addition this late in the game >>>> is safe to take, although my personal opinion is that since it was >>>> proposed before soft freeze, and DOES make life easier for libvirt, it >>>> is worth a strong consideration. >>> >>> Has this series being reviewed? >> >> v1 was reviewed pre-freeze; Laszlo has not yet posted v2 (in part >> because it was waiting on the qapi-as-event series which is now finally >> upstream). > > I'm fine with having it for 2.1. It would be great if v2 is posted today or > tomorrow.
It would be great indeed, but today is quite impossible for me. Tomorrow might work, however I usually mess up when I rush things. Until end of the week (Sunday) is more realistic for me, but it's probably not convenient for you. I'm OK if we push this to 2.2. Thanks Laszlo
