> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:35 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 v3][RESEND] ppc: Add software breakpoint support
> 
> 
> On 24.06.14 14:10, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> > This patch allow insert/remove software breakpoint
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhus...@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >   target-ppc/kvm.c | 71 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> --
> >   1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c index
> > 5238de7..8e2dbb3 100644
> > --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> > @@ -1317,6 +1317,53 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_dcr_write(CPUPPCState *env,
> uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t dat
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +int kvm_arch_insert_sw_breakpoint(CPUState *cs, struct
> > +kvm_sw_breakpoint *bp) {
> > +    /* Mixed endian case is not handled */
> > +    uint32_t sc = debug_inst_opcode;
> 
> What if debug_inst_opcode has never been set (thus is 0)?

Can "0" be a debug_inst_code ?

> In that case we should fail the insert, no?

Yes, will checking for "0" is sufficient or we need a cap_ also ?

Thanks
-Bharat

> 
> 
> Alex


Reply via email to