Il 13/06/2014 14:00, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto:
>
> Perhaps stop printing the message after the first 50-100 times?
>
> Paolo
>
Thank you very much for your feedback.
Maybe adding a monitor command (info drift) would be better ? Then
the user would not be spammed by printfs.
I think some spamming is okay, as long as it's not going on forever.
Perhaps even 10 times is enough (I'm not going to ask you to introduce a
rate limiting like printk's :)).
Adding this to the monitor can be useful even separately from the stderr
spam. Perhaps you can add the current drift to "info jit" if you feel
it is useful. You are user #0 of the feature, so your guess is better
than mine.
Paolo
