On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:35:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 15 May 2014 17:33, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:32:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 14 May 2014 04:53, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Resending: same as previous pull request but with numbers in the subject. > >> > Sorry about the noise. > >> > > >> > > >> > The following changes since commit > >> > 06b4f00d53637f2c16a62c2cbaa30bffb045cf88: > >> > > >> > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/qmp-unstable/queue/qmp' into > >> > staging (2014-05-09 15:46:34 +0100) > >> > > >> > are available in the git repository at: > >> > > >> > > >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git for_upstream > >> > > >> > for you to fetch changes up to 937251408051e0489f78e4db3c92e045b147b38b: > >> > > >> > virtio: allow mapping up to max queue size (2014-05-12 12:07:21 +0300) > >> > >> My apply-pullreq script complains: > >> merge: remotes/mst/for_upstream - not something we can merge > >> > >> did you mean "tags/for_upstream" ? > >> > >> thanks > >> -- PMM > > > > Yes: git used to get this right but it looks like it's broken in git > > master. > > hashes match and it's signed properly ... > > want me to resend? > > That's OK, I just wanted to check the tag name. (I notice this > kind of mismatch because I just copy-paste the url-and-branchname > onto my commandline. Also if we were ever to implement some kind > of automatic testing of pull-request-emails the automated script > would notice :-)) > > Applied, thanks. > > -- PMM
Note for git 2.0 users (once that's out): you must use tags/<name> for your pull requests, otherwise people using older clients will fail to pull from you. -- MST
