On 05/15/2014 07:10 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:

>>
>> We are moving towards having qapi guarantee sane defaults for FOO when
>> has_FOO is false; but aren't there yet.  You are correct that this needs
>> to guarantee that we aren't passing random memory.
>>
> 
> The QAPI code generator for the QMP input marshaller initializes all
> pointers to NULL, and all bools to false.  If has_ is false, then the
> associated pointer will also be NULL, so it is safe to just pass
> backing_file.

It didn't used to, and we still haven't documented that as being a
reliable guarantee, nor does the testsuite cover that.  It's still safer
to not rely on that fact until we make it part of the contract of qapi.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to