Sorry for late.
>
> > @@ -161,6 +171,11 @@ int cache_insert(PageCache *cache, uint64_t addr,
> const uint8_t *pdata)
> > /* actual update of entry */
> > it = cache_get_by_addr(cache, addr);
> >
> > + if ((it->it_data != NULL) && (it->it_age +
> > + CACHED_PAGE_LIFETIME > current_age)) {
> > + /* the cache page is fresh, don't replace it */
>
> Should we add a counter for this "misses"? It is a question to know how
> much it happens.
expose the rate of xbzrle cache miss to end user.
>
> BTW, do you have any benchmark/numbers showing that this is a good idea?
>
> Thanks, Juan.
Best regards,
-Gonglei
